Urgent Appeal addressed to Appellants' attorney Douglas W. Nicholson to furnish to The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington Division III - Two critical exhibits that irrefutably prove the fraudulent nature of this entire case from its inception.
Date: October 8, 2016
From: Louis Leclezio
To: Douglas Warren Nicholson - open letter.
Cc: The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington Division III: Honourable George B. Fearing, Honourable Robert E. Lawrence-Berrey Jr., Honourable Rebecca L. Pennell, Townsley Renee, Roberts Joyce, Dressler Samantha; Honourable Judge Scott Sparks, Mr. Jonathan Burke - WSBA; Daniel P. Mallove, Scott R. Sawyer, James McBride, Brian Dorsey, Cone Gilreath, Rick Osborne - Amerititle; Jeffrey Slothower.
URGENT - MISSING EXHIBITS:
Douggy,
I spent a sleepless night worrying about the consequences of you forgetting to offer to the Honourable Judges of The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington Division III the following two critical exhibits. 1. The Deed to the 76.8 acre subject property that was filed by you in the records of case # 042004112 in Kittitas County Superior Court. 2. The other essential exhibit originates from your clients, Michael L. Darland and Myrna Darland.
Exhibit # 1:
The Deed to the 76.8 acres showed Darlands and Leclezio as the property owners. You attached that Deed as an exhibit to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that you filed with Kittitas County Superior Court in January 2005. You were then acting as the joint attorney for Darland and I.
At that time you asserted that the case could have no standing without me being a plaintiff and a joint owner.
Looking at the Deed that you deemed necessary to attach to your motion would surely indicate that in January 2005 you firmly believed that I was also an owner of the subject property and a party to the suit. Hence, acting as a trustworthy officer of the court, you presented me as such to the Kittitas County Superior Court Judge Michael E. Cooper.
Exhibit # 2:
The letter dated February 22, 2006 sent to me by your client, Michael L. Darland with a copy addressed to you.
Note:
In 2009 you advised the senior disciplinary counsel of the Washington State Bar Association that your common practice is to object to inaccurate statements.
In his decision of November 25, 2009, Mr. Jonathan Burke, Senior Disciplinary Counsel of the WSBA writes that is what you stated to him.
To refresh your memory, you can review the entire decision of Mr. Burke through the link below.
http://snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info/docs/chapter3/23.pdf
Questions:
Does the fact that in 2006 you never objected to Darland's statements regarding his and his wife's sole ownership of the 76.8 acres mean that you agreed with Darland's novel position in February 2006?
If so, will you please enlighten the Honourable Judges what changed between 2005 and 2006?
Why was it accurate for you to represent Darlands and I as joint owners in 2005?
Why in 2006 did you agree that it was inaccurate for you to have done so in 2005?
Why did you not object one way or the other? Should you not have objected either in 2005 when you filed the motion and exhibits or in 2006 after receiving a copy of that mail from Darland?
What changed between January 2005, September 2005 (when, pretending to have my best interest at heart, you urged me to sign the Settlement Agreement with the District, supposedly for both Darland and my joint benefit) and February 2006 when you agreed with Darland's newly adopted posture?
By February 2006 what had caused you to no longer believe that I was and should still be an owner of record as well as a pivotal plaintiff to any case involving Darland v. Snoqualmie?
Your answers to the above questions should go a long way to assist the Honourable Judges to determine your credibility and the merits of case # 34081-3.
Douggy, over the last 11 years, you have come too far, and worked too hard, to help your preferred clients, Michael L. and Myrna Darland profit and enrich themselves at the expense of others only to lose again now in front of the Court of Appeals.
After already losing in front of the Honourable Judge Scott R. Sparks, suffering another loss over the same issue would not look good on your record.
You will recall that I have already sent some exhibits to Mrs. R. Townsley, the administrator of the Washington State Court of Appeals Division III. I understand that, considered by you to be no longer a corner stone of the case, my exhibits may not get filed in the records.
Douggy, how can you, a mere attorney in the employ of the Ellensburg law firm of Lathrop, Winbauer, Harrel etc. self appoint yourself as judge and decide when is it convenient to include or to exclude me as a party to this 12 year running and still ongoing case?
Is it not up to wise and Honourable Judges to decide whether my presence is still essential to validate case # 34081-3?
How can it be solely up to you and your bias to decide whether my presence as the guy who paid the fare + my sworn testimony as the only participant to negotiations with the Snoqualmie Pass District should be on the record in order to best serve the cause of equitable justice?
However, as my past attorney initially, and as my and Darlands' joint attorney subsequently, you have appreciably benefited from me over many years. Therefore, I am confident that you will kindly help me to get the very telling exhibits mentioned above into the record.
I thank you.
I pray for and I wish a God like Justice to all the involved parties who are by your design, present and absent, from case # 34081-3 in front of The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington Division III.
P.S.
Just in case you misplaced the mail dated February 22, 2006 from Michael L. Darland, I am copying it for you below.
Please let me know should you also need a copy of the September 29, 2005 mail you sent to me urging me to sign the Settlement Agreement.
Further factual details regarding this sad saga are available through the following two links:
www.lleclezio.blogspot.com and www.snocadia-promoter-michael-l-darland.info
Exhibit # 2:
From: Michael L Darland <michael@southernchilexp.com>
Date: February 22, 2006 at 8:46:05 PM GMT+4
To: Louis Leclezio <leclezio@hotmail.com>
Cc: Doug Nicholson <dnicholson@eburglaw.com>, "James D. McBride" <mcbride@julin-mcbridelaw.com>, Brian Dorsey <dorsey@julin-mcbridelaw.com>
Subject: Update on title assistance request
Dear Louie:
Attached is a letter regarding the title matter on Snocadia for which I requested your assistance on the 8th of February. I have good news regarding the outcome.
Best regards,
Michael
Yan Kee Way Lodge
Ensenada, Chile
February 22, 2006
Dear Louie:
I received your email and attachments of February 18, 2006 and was sorry to learn of your health condition but pleased that you finally consulted a doctor and are receiving medical advice and, I presume, treatment. Myrna and I regret that you would not accept our offer to loan you funds for your medical expenses in addition to the financial assistance we were loaning to you for living expenses. Earlier intervention may have reduced the severity of your current condition.
On the matter of the mistaken filing of your name on the title to the Snocadia property, our prayers were answered. I never did receive a response to my email of February 8th requesting your assistance to help us on this title matter by sending the Quitclaim Deed as Rick Osborne, General Manager of AmeriTitle, requested. As it turns out, you need no longer concern yourself with sending that paperwork to AmeriTitle. The Kittitas County Auditor’s Office reread all of the documents, including the Bargain and Sale Deed, and concluded that your name and address should never have appeared on the title and thus had it removed. Now the title for the entire 76.8-acre property is, as it should be, registered in Myrna’s name and mine as husband and wife. The address has been corrected as well and, from this point forward, tax bills will be sent to my home and not yours.
I trust that this good news will be a positive assist in your rest and recovery.
Regards,
Michael L. Darland
Page 1 of 1
Louie letter of February 22, 2006
1 comment:
I see you are still involved with this court case. Takes forever.
Post a Comment