First American Corporation - Goldman Sachs - Reuters Report

NEW YORK (Reuters) –

“Goldman Sachs forecasts global credit losses stemming from the current market turmoil will reach $1.2 trillion, with Wall Street accounting for nearly 40 percent of the losses.

Of the cumulative losses expected by these leveraged players, bad residential home loans will represent about half…”

No thanks to The First American Corporation for allegedly triggering this financial meltdown according to a number of lawsuits filed.

The suits charge a First American subsidiary with fraud. They accuse The First American Corporation and its subsidiary of irresponsibly delivering inflated appraisals for business reasons of its own!!!

Incidentally, what is First American’s market cap?

Are chances in favor of it being wiped out when and if confirmed guilty?

What a Good Riddance!

The First American Corporation - Forbes Follow Through...

Link: http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2008/0407/032a.html?partner=yahoomag

Forbes – Scott Woolley: “Title insurance firms rake in $18 billion a year for a product that is outdated, largely unneeded and protected by law, we wrote. Now New York home buyers are leveling the same charges in an antitrust suit against the insurers, including First American (nyse: FAF) …”

Over the years, The First American Corporation figured that fines imposed against it in multiple States & lawsuits were just part of the cost of doing business in an environment that allowed First American to ruthlessly bleed the public.

However with ever increasing lawsuits alleging fraud, profiteering and racketeering against The First American Corporation, how much more will the First American Corporation be required to set aside in reserves in order to face the mounting multi million dollar claims piling up against it?

Can Attorney Generals from multiple States, the public and the lawyers be forever wrong?

First American Corporation makes Xinhua News

It is interesting that the First American Corporation should make news in Xinhua Province, China, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-11/02/content_6997622.htm Editor Gareth Dodd of Xinhuanet, www.chinaview.cn chose strong words to report on the fraudulent and scandalous behavior of First American Corporation that helped trigger the mortgage market international meltdown.

Is the Xinhua news attempting to warn the Chinese population about the high risk and low reward of doing business with First American?

Should Xinhuanet further investigate and expose First American? How long does it take for The First American Corporation to settle substantial claims on average? How much could an insured be forced to spend over the years in pursuit of justice? How often does First American win by default by driving legal costs out of the reach of the average claimant? Does that explain why The First American Corporation has only paid as little as 3% of its billion dollar revenues in claims?

Of further interest it is to be noted that AP Singapore reports that in a recent e-mail, Southeast Asia's largest bank instructed traders in an e-mail not to do business with Lehman Brothers. In a subsequent e-mail DBS Group Holdings Ltd. advised traders to review new transactions (with Lehman Brothers) case by case.

On a case by case basis, should officials from South East Asia’s largest bank be made aware that Frank McMahon was a past senior exec of Lehman before joining The First American Corporation and that Frank may well some day attempt to dump FAF (NYSE trading symbol for The First American Corporation) stock onto the Asian markets just as he did on European markets through Lehman London offices shortly before the stock imploded!

Will The First American Corporation Split in time...

OR Will it be driven into bankruptcy beforehand?

Source: International Oxford Analytica 03.12.08, 6:00 AM ET

A Think tank group reported on NY’s Attorney General: “Cuomo's investigations … tend to target conflicts of interest whereby companies have allegedly exploited consumers … and reflect a more proactive approach to the subprime crisis.”

“Last November, Cuomo filed a lawsuit against mortgage lender First American (nyse: FAF - news - people ) for allegedly conspiring with Washington Mutual (nyse: WM - news - people ) to inflate its real estate appraisals.”

“Cuomo believed fraudulent real estate appraisals were a key factor in artificially inflating real estate values and contributed to the subprime crisis.”

Obviously this case, with international implications, has potential crippling financial consequences for FAF.

If Cuomo and his helpers who are pursuing this case aggressively prove to be right,
The First American Corporation could well face claims running into hundreds of millions of dollars from defrauded parties.

Because Cuomo's office lacks the resources to mount intensive investigations of subprime legal violations, much of the heavy lifting in multiple ongoing probes is now being done by the Securities and Exchange Commission, The U.S. attorney's offices in Manhattan and Brooklyn and the FBI. Cuomo and other state attorneys general--in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Ohio--are playing an unofficial watchdog role, informally overseeing the activities of federal officials.

If Cuomo prevails in time, First American may well be stopped from splitting and find itself driven into bankruptcy instead.

Note that in my personal case, The First American Corporation did not hesitate to engage into fraud and to accept an overly inflated appraisal from my crooked partner. Like in the WAMU case The First American Corporation did so, solely in the hope of future business! See Jerome Lasky’s opinion (Moses & Singer, NY.) as disclosed previously on www.lleclezio.blogspot.com

In the light of the above it would appear that fraud spanning many years is systemic at The First American Corporation. Hopefully, this time, James J. Dufficy will not succeed to corrupt his old work pals at the FBI and get them to squash the case!

In any event, those touting Jan ’09 calls at $50 are nothing but paid FAF shills wearing a variety of hats to best serve the corporation and further defraud the public. Their orchestrated punch and counter punch tactic is a well thought out psychological strategy. It emanates from a common boiler room and it is solely designed to influence buy and sell modes of the public in order to suit the corporation’s long term ambitions.

Oxford Analytica is an independent strategic-consulting firm drawing on a network of more than 1,000 scholar experts at Oxford and other leading universities and research institutions around the world.